ANOMALIES 1(D): ‘This major finding may help climatologists to distinguish between solar and man-made influences on climate.’

ANOMALIES 1(E): ‘Dr. Willson said most researchers expected greenhouse gases to warm the planet by 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit over the next 100 years. Solar irradiance could add another 0.72 degrees, he said.’

I could go on but I think readers will get my point. These quotes were taken from a quick scan of just a few of the sites you list which supposedly support your views. I suggest the author would be rewarded by a more careful, open-minded reading of the evidence .

Changes in the Earth’s orbit and the tilt of its axis are well understood and referred to as Milankovitch cycles after the Serbian scientist Milutin Milankovitch who first described them. You might want to look him up. They explain the cycle of Ice Ages and interglacial periods evidenced over hundreds of thousands of years through ice core and other proxy data. They DO NOT explain the sudden warming which has occured over the last 100-odd years.

Changes in the Earth’s magnetic field, solar flares, sunspot activity, etc. are less understood but acknowledged by the scientific community and the subject of ongoing studies. What is known is that the Earth’s magnetic field has ‘flipped’ in the past (North becomes South and vice-versa) and there is no archaeological evidence whatsoever to suggest this had any deleterious effect on life on the planet.

You say, ‘Tens of hundreds of scientists believe the green house gas theory is false.’ Name them. And cite the peer-reviewed papers which support this assertion – if you know what a ‘peer-reviewed paper’ is.

Finally, there are so many ridiculous fact-free assertions in this piece I could go on forever refuting them, so let’s just take one for illustrative purposes. You say, ‘These electromagnetic, and magnetic forces move the air in earth’s upper, and lower atmosphere. Air can’t move on its own.’ Have you seriously not heard of convection? This is primary school science you obviously don’t understand, yet you want us to believe your arrant nonsense over the consensus view of the climate science community. Seriously mate, if you’ve been studying this for 30 years and this is the best you can come up with, you’ve wasted a big chunk of your life.