<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Reacties op: Climate change problem and its ground reality in Nepal</title>
	<atom:link href="/continent/south-asia/climate-change-problem-and-its-ground-reality-in-nepal-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nl-aid.org/continent/south-asia/climate-change-problem-and-its-ground-reality-in-nepal-2/</link>
	<description>NL-Aid is a &#039;blog and news agency&#039; about foreign aid, development cooperation, international politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:33:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Door: mememine69</title>
		<link>http://www.nl-aid.org/continent/south-asia/climate-change-problem-and-its-ground-reality-in-nepal-2/#comment-7677</link>
		<dc:creator>mememine69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nl-aid.org/?p=8042#comment-7677</guid>
		<description>Nobody is going to vote now for taxing the air we breathe with corporate run carbon trading markets that are ruled by politicians. That is what “science” wants us to do to, to “fight” climate change. This wasn’t about climate change; it was about you and I controlling a changing climate by adjusting the temperature with Human CO2. Prepare to be mocked in the history books, all of us.
The academic practice of exaggerating a worst case scenario isn’t really lying because these lab coat consultants call it “study” and “research? So even though climate change is not real, it’s not a lie to say it is real. In this madness of political correctness, the proof that Human’s CO2 is causing a climate crisis is held in high praise as “consensus”.  But everyone one of the thousands of consensus scientists all have a personal definition of climate change’s effects, NEVER the causes. Can you say consultant’s w#t dream? On the other side of the coin, all denier science deals only in proving that we are going to be causing a climate crisis and not the powers of the cosmos anymore. How many scientists to change a light bulb? None, but they do have consensus that it WILL change.
 We have all been brainwashed into viewing the poor little planet as weak and fragile and any little jolt will put it out of balance and then spiral into a catastrophic climate crisis. Where do comet hits fit in to being “weak”? And can someone explain the tropical fossils under the melting ice please? I thought this climate of today has never happened before. Now who’s the fear mongering red necked evolution denier? Denying ancient climate denies evolution too.  NOTHING is worse than a climate crisis as it is the ultimate disaster and we the former believer voting MAJORITY,  will change our votes when we see the thousands of concerned scientists marching en mass to warn the world of their greatest crisis ever, climate crisis. Only a comet hit could be worse. Obama didn’t mention the crisis in his state of the union address and the scientist’s reaction at being snubbed by Obama was…………? It was a tragic exaggeration fuelled by greed and political correctness akin to ancient omen worship; “I see the changes. The change is all around us. Look at the change.” Let history note this planet lover was a denier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody is going to vote now for taxing the air we breathe with corporate run carbon trading markets that are ruled by politicians. That is what “science” wants us to do to, to “fight” climate change. This wasn’t about climate change; it was about you and I controlling a changing climate by adjusting the temperature with Human CO2. Prepare to be mocked in the history books, all of us.<br />
The academic practice of exaggerating a worst case scenario isn’t really lying because these lab coat consultants call it “study” and “research? So even though climate change is not real, it’s not a lie to say it is real. In this madness of political correctness, the proof that Human’s CO2 is causing a climate crisis is held in high praise as “consensus”.  But everyone one of the thousands of consensus scientists all have a personal definition of climate change’s effects, NEVER the causes. Can you say consultant’s w#t dream? On the other side of the coin, all denier science deals only in proving that we are going to be causing a climate crisis and not the powers of the cosmos anymore. How many scientists to change a light bulb? None, but they do have consensus that it WILL change.<br />
 We have all been brainwashed into viewing the poor little planet as weak and fragile and any little jolt will put it out of balance and then spiral into a catastrophic climate crisis. Where do comet hits fit in to being “weak”? And can someone explain the tropical fossils under the melting ice please? I thought this climate of today has never happened before. Now who’s the fear mongering red necked evolution denier? Denying ancient climate denies evolution too.  NOTHING is worse than a climate crisis as it is the ultimate disaster and we the former believer voting MAJORITY,  will change our votes when we see the thousands of concerned scientists marching en mass to warn the world of their greatest crisis ever, climate crisis. Only a comet hit could be worse. Obama didn’t mention the crisis in his state of the union address and the scientist’s reaction at being snubbed by Obama was…………? It was a tragic exaggeration fuelled by greed and political correctness akin to ancient omen worship; “I see the changes. The change is all around us. Look at the change.” Let history note this planet lover was a denier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
