<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Reacties op: USA&#8217;s Hippocratic attitude towards its allies</title>
	<atom:link href="/continent/south-asia/usas-hippocratic-attitude-towards-its-allies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nl-aid.org/continent/south-asia/usas-hippocratic-attitude-towards-its-allies/</link>
	<description>NL-Aid is a &#039;blog and news agency&#039; about foreign aid, development cooperation, international politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:19:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Mira</title>
		<link>http://www.nl-aid.org/continent/south-asia/usas-hippocratic-attitude-towards-its-allies/#comment-27458</link>
		<dc:creator>Mira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nl-aid.org/?p=11157#comment-27458</guid>
		<description>Just so you know, to say the USA has a &quot;Hippocratic&quot; attitude toward India&#039;s nuclear power would seem to imply that the USA views this as fulfilling an oath to uphold health. But perhaps this word was well-chosen after all; the US does consider Indian nuclear power as a good inoculation against an outbreak of Chinese or North Korean sponsored nuclear war.

Also, there&#039;s nothing hypocritical (which I suspect is the word you intended) in the US fearing Chinese or North Korean nukes but not minding the same from India (or the Netherlands). History has shown that democracies do not make war on one another, so the US does not fear an attack from India on itself or its allies. Alas, the same cannot be said for the corrupt and unstable dictatorships of China or North Korea. 

Why does Japan fear North Korea, but not South Korea, when South Korea is a much stronger state and more of an economic rival to Japan? After all, both Koreas have historical reasons to resent Japan, and South Korea even has territorial disputes with Japan. But both South Korea and Japan are democracies, so they are unlikely to fight, whereas North Korea is unremittingly hostile to both.

If China were to democratize, then you would find that the US would not fear, and indeed might even welcome, Chinese military strength. For one thing, it is unlikely that a democratic China would continue to prop up the vile and murderous regime in North Korea that has resulted in the democide of over 3 million of its citizens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so you know, to say the USA has a &#8220;Hippocratic&#8221; attitude toward India&#8217;s nuclear power would seem to imply that the USA views this as fulfilling an oath to uphold health. But perhaps this word was well-chosen after all; the US does consider Indian nuclear power as a good inoculation against an outbreak of Chinese or North Korean sponsored nuclear war.</p>
<p>Also, there&#8217;s nothing hypocritical (which I suspect is the word you intended) in the US fearing Chinese or North Korean nukes but not minding the same from India (or the Netherlands). History has shown that democracies do not make war on one another, so the US does not fear an attack from India on itself or its allies. Alas, the same cannot be said for the corrupt and unstable dictatorships of China or North Korea. </p>
<p>Why does Japan fear North Korea, but not South Korea, when South Korea is a much stronger state and more of an economic rival to Japan? After all, both Koreas have historical reasons to resent Japan, and South Korea even has territorial disputes with Japan. But both South Korea and Japan are democracies, so they are unlikely to fight, whereas North Korea is unremittingly hostile to both.</p>
<p>If China were to democratize, then you would find that the US would not fear, and indeed might even welcome, Chinese military strength. For one thing, it is unlikely that a democratic China would continue to prop up the vile and murderous regime in North Korea that has resulted in the democide of over 3 million of its citizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Sanjay</title>
		<link>http://www.nl-aid.org/continent/south-asia/usas-hippocratic-attitude-towards-its-allies/#comment-27336</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nl-aid.org/?p=11157#comment-27336</guid>
		<description>I strongly oppose manipulative Dutch interests trying to prop up 5th-columnists in 3rd-world countries to undermine their national security. That&#039;s extremely unethical. Why don&#039;t the Dutch first practice what they preach to others (via these 5th-columnists whom they support), by first withdrawing from NATO? Then they can preach pacifism to others afterwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strongly oppose manipulative Dutch interests trying to prop up 5th-columnists in 3rd-world countries to undermine their national security. That&#8217;s extremely unethical. Why don&#8217;t the Dutch first practice what they preach to others (via these 5th-columnists whom they support), by first withdrawing from NATO? Then they can preach pacifism to others afterwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
