<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Reacties op: Singapore&#8217;s General Election: First signs of a chink in PAP&#8217;s armor?</title>
	<atom:link href="/continent/south-east-asia/singapores-general-election-first-signs-of-a-chink-in-paps-armor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nl-aid.org/continent/south-east-asia/singapores-general-election-first-signs-of-a-chink-in-paps-armor/</link>
	<description>NL-Aid is &#039;a blog press agency&#039; about foreign aid, development cooperation, international politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:46:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Door: Scott&#8217;s Weblog &#187; 2011 Singapore Elections: Results and Aftermath</title>
		<link>http://www.nl-aid.org/continent/south-east-asia/singapores-general-election-first-signs-of-a-chink-in-paps-armor/#comment-2764</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott&#8217;s Weblog &#187; 2011 Singapore Elections: Results and Aftermath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nl-aid.org/?p=4878#comment-2764</guid>
		<description>[...] would call a landslide, the PAP lost the popular and experienced foreign minister, MP George Yeo. Yeo was a casualty among other PAP MPs in the Aljunied GRC which was won by the Worker&#8217;s Party.... I know nothing about the guy except that his supporters vandalized Orchard with paper stickers, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would call a landslide, the PAP lost the popular and experienced foreign minister, MP George Yeo. Yeo was a casualty among other PAP MPs in the Aljunied GRC which was won by the Worker&#8217;s Party&#8230;. I know nothing about the guy except that his supporters vandalized Orchard with paper stickers, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: San</title>
		<link>http://www.nl-aid.org/continent/south-east-asia/singapores-general-election-first-signs-of-a-chink-in-paps-armor/#comment-2428</link>
		<dc:creator>San</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 06:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nl-aid.org/?p=4878#comment-2428</guid>
		<description>My apologies – the article is accurate on this point – NCMPs were introduced in 1984 and not what I stated earlier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies – the article is accurate on this point – NCMPs were introduced in 1984 and not what I stated earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Door: San</title>
		<link>http://www.nl-aid.org/continent/south-east-asia/singapores-general-election-first-signs-of-a-chink-in-paps-armor/#comment-2427</link>
		<dc:creator>San</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 06:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nl-aid.org/?p=4878#comment-2427</guid>
		<description>Some factual inaccuracies here:

1. Singapore’s independence from Malaysia was in 1965

2. NCMPs were introduced in 1988, not 1984.

3. GRCs also were introduced for the 1988 elections (it says “GRCs were introduced in YEAR”)

Incidentally, the thing about GRCs is that they are double-edged swords. Parties either win big or lose big. The PAP has been used to winning big, and this was the first time they lost 5 members at one shot (in Aljunied) rather than in scattered constituencies. Maybe all five WP members would have been returned if the GRC was split into five single constituencies. More likely, they would not, the strength of some of their team members carrying the whole team through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some factual inaccuracies here:</p>
<p>1. Singapore’s independence from Malaysia was in 1965</p>
<p>2. NCMPs were introduced in 1988, not 1984.</p>
<p>3. GRCs also were introduced for the 1988 elections (it says “GRCs were introduced in YEAR”)</p>
<p>Incidentally, the thing about GRCs is that they are double-edged swords. Parties either win big or lose big. The PAP has been used to winning big, and this was the first time they lost 5 members at one shot (in Aljunied) rather than in scattered constituencies. Maybe all five WP members would have been returned if the GRC was split into five single constituencies. More likely, they would not, the strength of some of their team members carrying the whole team through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
