USA’s Hippocratic attitude towards its allies
Posted on | april 23, 2012 | 2 Comments
Soon after India tested the Agni 5 Intercontinental Ballistic Missile, the USA showed its solidarity towards the Indian government with the message of success. The solidarity came in action in contrast to the USA’s weak and bad relationship with CHINA. How practical is it to use counter measure strategy in empowering your enemies enemy in making them powerful, highlighting the check and balance system. With India being capable of such weapon of mass destruction /nuclear power the whole Asia is at risk of domination and manipulation. I’m not being bias towards India but my rage is at the attitude of the US hypocrisy that supports and risks the world in view of its ego. Like such I’m not supporting China too, I strongly oppose China being in the league but the policy of the US in counter measure strategy of CHINA making INDIA stronger with weapons of mass destruction is what I completely disagree.
Recently in the Nuclear summit in South Korea, The USA condemned north Korea‘s missile testing program then how relevant is it for the same country to support India for its successful testing and supporting it technically. US diplomatic relationship and policies have always been strategically bias and irk toward its allies and enemies but what about the future. In this run of nuclear power aren’t we creating monster in bid to our personal weakness and egos. India being nuclear rich is not a question of right or wrong but the world being threatened of a nuclear war is?
The US in its desperate attempt of countering china is support India giving it technological advantage which is wrong. No matter who develops the weapon the threat is for the world to bear and why is that just by securing themselves they feel they have done their part.
The Agni 5 is 50-tonne, 17.5-metre-high intercontinental ballistic
AUTHOR: Shreedeep Rayamajhi
URL: http://www.rayznews.com
E-MAIL: weaker41 [at] gmail.com
Tags: Agni 5 > ballistic > China > India > Intercontinental Ballistic Missile > missile
Comments
2 Responses to “USA’s Hippocratic attitude towards its allies”
Leave a Reply
april 23rd, 2012 @ 18:12
I strongly oppose manipulative Dutch interests trying to prop up 5th-columnists in 3rd-world countries to undermine their national security. That’s extremely unethical. Why don’t the Dutch first practice what they preach to others (via these 5th-columnists whom they support), by first withdrawing from NATO? Then they can preach pacifism to others afterwards.
april 24th, 2012 @ 23:19
Just so you know, to say the USA has a “Hippocratic” attitude toward India’s nuclear power would seem to imply that the USA views this as fulfilling an oath to uphold health. But perhaps this word was well-chosen after all; the US does consider Indian nuclear power as a good inoculation against an outbreak of Chinese or North Korean sponsored nuclear war.
Also, there’s nothing hypocritical (which I suspect is the word you intended) in the US fearing Chinese or North Korean nukes but not minding the same from India (or the Netherlands). History has shown that democracies do not make war on one another, so the US does not fear an attack from India on itself or its allies. Alas, the same cannot be said for the corrupt and unstable dictatorships of China or North Korea.
Why does Japan fear North Korea, but not South Korea, when South Korea is a much stronger state and more of an economic rival to Japan? After all, both Koreas have historical reasons to resent Japan, and South Korea even has territorial disputes with Japan. But both South Korea and Japan are democracies, so they are unlikely to fight, whereas North Korea is unremittingly hostile to both.
If China were to democratize, then you would find that the US would not fear, and indeed might even welcome, Chinese military strength. For one thing, it is unlikely that a democratic China would continue to prop up the vile and murderous regime in North Korea that has resulted in the democide of over 3 million of its citizens.