2,784 black babies tested with new TB vaccine
Posted on | april 30, 2011 | 1 Comment
Experimental TB inoculation trials now enter phase two in Cape Town
2,784 non-white babies from the poorest Cape Town communities hold the key to finding a new TB vaccine – but could these babies really give their ‘informed consent’ as ethics rules demand?
Baby Leroy Muller sat on his mom Sarie’s lap while receiving the last innoculation in the trials to find a new vaccine for Tuberculosis today. He was the 2,784th baby to be given the experimental vaccine under the South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative.
The research was launched in July 2009 under the auspices of the Institute for Infectuous Diseases and Molecular Medicine at Cape Town University medical school. Innoculation-manager Dr Michele Tameris said that while the innoculation test-phase (one) now has been completed, the babies will be monitored until April next year. Half of the babies were given the vaccine – the others a placebo. Tameris said that ‘if the new vaccine is proven to be effective, the next phase will start involving 25,000 people worldwide.’
Babies from the poorest Afrikaans-speaking populations in the towns of Worcester, Robertson, De Doorns, Touwsriver, Montagu, Ashton, Bonnievale, McGregor, Wolseley, Tulbagh, Prince Alfred Hamlet, Rawsonville, Villiersdorp and Ceres participate in the trials. This region is known for its very high prevalence of Tuberculosis – among the world’s highest.
Ms Brits interviewed parent Francis Gordon of Ceres, who was there with baby Connor on the last day of the innoculation-stage . She said ’ it is a good thing to participate.’ And baby Hanico Spannenberg’s mom said he’s not really aware of anything other that ‘at this stage of his life he is just eating, drinking and crying.”
Quotes on the SATVI website:
“Quite simply put, we are trying to ascertain why some of the babies, despite having been vaccinated at birth, still develop TB. We are part of the war against TB.’
“SATVI is committed to high ethical standards necessary for conducting research involving human participants. We ensure that the safety of study participants comes first, and make sure that all are well informed of their rights before, during and after trials. A dedicated Regulatory Affairs team ensures we comply with local, national and international standards. In addition, all personnel receive rigorous training in Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and/or Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), which includes consenting of and appropriate communication with study participants. Our activities are overseen by the University of Cape Town’s Faculty of Health Sciences Human Research Ethics Committee, which complies with regulatory frameworks nationally and internationally.”
Source:
* Elsabé Brits, pictures: SATVI
* http://www.dieburger.com/
AUTHOR: Adriana Stuijt
URL: http://censorbugbear.blogspot.com
E-MAIL: a.j.stuijt [at] knid.nl
Tags: Ashton > baby > Bonnievale > Cape Town > Ceres > De Doorns > Francis Gordon of Ceres > Good Clinical Practice > Good Laboratory Practice > Health Sciences Human Research Ethics Committee > Institute for Infectuous Diseases > Leroy Muller > McGregor > Michele Tameris > Molecular Medicine > Montagu > poorest > populations > Prince Alfred Hamlet > Rawsonville > research > Robertson > TB vaccine > Touwsriver > trials > Tuberculosis > Tulbagh > university > University of Cape Town > vaccine > Villiersdorp > Wolseley > Worcester
Comments
One Response to “2,784 black babies tested with new TB vaccine”
Leave a Reply
mei 18th, 2011 @ 18:49
I have no control over this website – but received an objection from journalist Elsabe Brits who maintained that the material I used, was copyrighted. However SATVI’s photograph comes from their site – which is funded with public funds – and publicly-funded material published on a non-profit website is not subject to such copyright laws: such material should be freely available to the taxpayers who funded it. In this particular case, the Dutch government also co-sponsored the programme, i.a. the Dutch taxpayers, of whom I am one. I have noted Miss Brits’ objections and profusely apologise. I still don’t believe that the story is inaccurate – Ms Brits possibly may not have liked my questioning the fact that uninformed babies were being used as test-subjects. She demanded that the article be removed at once. I leave it up to the editor of this site to make the decision.